Content:
- MLKCLC-Endorsements
- Marylin Watkins--State's Tax Structure
- Tanisha Warner--Tips on Settling
Debt
Martin Luther King, Jr. County Labor Council, AFL-CIO
2008 Primary Election Endorsements
opeiu8/afl-cio
Federal Races
U.S. House of Representatives, 1st Dist. Jay Inslee (D)
U.S. House of Representatives, 2nd Dist. Rick Larsen
(D)
U.S. House of Representatives,
7th Dist. Jim McDermott (D)
U.S. House of Representatives, 8th Dist. Darcy Burner (D)
U.S. House of Representatives, 9th Dist. Adam Smith
(D)
Statewide
Races
Governor Chris Gregoire (D)
Lieutenant Governor Brad
Owen (D)
Secretary of State Sam Reed (R)
State Treasurer Jim McIntire (D)
Auditor Brian Sonntag
(D)
Attorney General John Ladenburg (D)
Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler (D)
Public Lands
Commissioner Peter Goldmark (D)
1st Dist. Senate Rosemary
McAuliffe (D)
1st Dist. Representative, Pos. 1 Al O’Brien
(D)
1st Dist. Representative, Pos. 2 Mark Ericks (D)
11th District Senate Margarita Prentice (D)
11th District Representative, Pos. 1 Zack Hudgins (D)
11th District Representative, Pos. 2 Bob Hasegawa (D)
30th District Representative, Pos. 1 Mark Miloscia (D)
30th District Representative, Pos. 2 Carol Gregory (D)
31st District Representative, Pos. 1 Ron Weigelt (D)
31st District Representative, Pos. 2 Chris Hurst (D)
32nd District Representative, Pos. 1 Maralyn Chase (D)
32nd District Representative, Pos. 2 Ruth Kagi (D)
33rd District Representative, Pos. 1 Tina Louise Orwall (D)
33rd District Representative, Pos. 2 Dave Upthegrove (D)
34th District Senate Joe McDermott (D)
34th District Representative,
Pos. 1 Eileen Cody (D)
34th
District Representative,
Pos. 2 Sharon Nelson (D)opeiu8/afl-cio
Martin Luther King, Jr. County Labor Council,
AFL-CIO 2008 Primary Election Endorsements
36th District Representative, Pos. 2 Mary Lou Dickerson (D)
37th District Representative, Pos. 1 Sharon Tomiko-Santos (D)
37th District Representative, Pos. 2 Eric Pettigrew (D)
39th District Senate Fred Walser (D)
39th District Representative,
Pos. 1 Scott Olson (D)
41st
District Senate Fred Jarrett
(D)
41st District Representative, Pos. 1 Marcie Maxwell
(D)
41st District Representative, Pos. 2 Judy Clibborn
(D)
43rd District Representative, Pos. 2 Frank Chopp
(D)
45th District Representative, Pos. 1 Roger Goodman
(D)
45th District Representative, Pos. 2 Larry Springer
(D)
46th District Representative, Pos. 1 Scott White
(D)
46th District Representative, Pos. 2 Phyllis Kenney
(D)
47th District Representative, Pos. 1 Geoff Simpson
(D)
47th District Representative, Pos. 2 Pat Sullivan
(D)
48th District Representative, Pos. 1 Ross Hunter
(D)
48th District Representative, Pos. 2 Deb Eddy (D)
Judicial Races
State Supreme Court, Pos. 3 Mary Fairhurst (NP)
State Supreme
Court, Pos. 4 Charles Johnson (NP)
State Supreme Court, Pos. 7 Debra Stephens (NP)
State Court of
Appeals, Pos. 3 Kevin Korsmo (NP)
King County Superior Court, Pos. 1 Susan Amini (NP)
King County Superior
Court, Pos. 10 Regina Cahan (NP)
King County Superior Court, Pos. 18 Susan Craighead (NP)
King County Superior
Court, Pos. 22 Holly Hill (NP)
King County Superior Court, Pos. 37 Nick Corning (NP)
King County Superior
Court, Pos. 49 Monica Benton (NP)
King County Superior Court, Pos. 52 Bruce Heller (NP)
King County Superior
Court, Pos. 53 Mariane Spearman (NP)
Washington's tax structure direly needs a makeover
By Marilyn Watkins
Last week I spent a couple days in our nation's capital. After my meetings,
I had time to stroll down the mall from the Lincoln Memorial, past the Washington Monument, and White House, toward the Capitol
building. I saw families from across the United States and around the world posing for pictures, absorbing the history around
them.
The
National Mall is a good place to start a discussion of our state budget and taxes. Those majestic monuments to democracy and
crowds of tourists are reminders of why we have government in the first place -- in the words of the U.S. Constitution, to
"establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure
the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity."
We can't do
those things on our own.
Washington state is facing a budget deficit next year.
The national economic downturn means less tax revenue, but there will be more kids in school, more young adults trying to
get into college, more seniors needing long-term care and more struggling families needing assistance. And the state, like
everyone else, has to deal with higher prices.
Some are trying to turn the looming
deficit into a partisan issue, claiming those in charge in Olympia have "overspent." But according to the National
Association of State Budget Officers, many states are in worse shape than Washington. Thirteen states -- not including Washington
-- have had to cut their budgets already this year, nearly equally divided between those with Democratic and Republican governors.
Forty states -- again, not Washington -- have begun dipping into their reserves.
Gov.
Gregoire, rightly, has ordered agency heads to find ways to save. But with over half the budget going to education, nearly
40 percent to such human services as child protection and health care, and most of the rest for courts, natural resources
and bond payments, there aren't many places to cut. Most state money, in fact, gets invested right back in local communities,
in the 295 school districts, the 45 institutions of higher learning, and salaries for nurses and social workers.
Most of the increased state spending over the past four years can be accounted for by population
growth -- we add about 100,000 people each year, inflation, and make up from cuts during the last recession. We've also
expanded full-day kindergarten and added space in colleges along with more financial aid.
The
state has also found ways to tighten its belt. As a result, Washington's budget has stayed flat at about 6 percent of
the state economy since the mid-1990s. And the number of state government employees has actually fallen as a share of overall
employment in each of the last five years.
We could get through this economic downturn
like the last one, by cutting children's health insurance, short-changing teachers, and spending down the rainy day fund.
Or we could raise taxes. The trouble is that most of our state taxes fall hardest on working families already struggling to
pay the bills.
Our tax system worked pretty well in the 1930s when it was designed.
The economy today is quite different. It's time to change our tax system. In 2002, a high level commission headed by Bill
Gates, Sr., recommended a thorough overhaul of state taxes, which the Legislature hastily shelved.
Maybe we should start with something less ambitious. How about a new high income tax that exempts the first
$200,000 of family income, then begins at 3 percent and jumps to 5 percent on incomes over $1 million? It could be coupled
with a reduction in either the sales or property tax. That way, most families would see their total tax bill decline. Only
four out of 100 households would pay the new tax, and it would be those that have seen their incomes grow fastest and their
federal taxes fall the most in the past decade.
Revenue from the new tax could be
dedicated to our highest priorities -- education and health care.
We could actually
come out of this economic slowdown with a fairer tax system that makes it easier for our state government to provide the necessary
foundation for the just, peaceful, and free society our Founding Fathers envisioned.
Marilyn
Watkins, policy director of the Economic Opportunity Instititue (www.eoionline.org), writes every other Wednesday. Her e-mail
address is marilyn@eoionline.org.
Understanding Debt
Settlement
By
Tanisha Warner
Money Management International
With the cost of living rising, many Americans are finding it harder to make ends meet each month. If your credit card
balances are becoming unmanageable, it’s important to know all the facts before pursuing a debt settlement.
Many times, if a creditor feels that they cannot collect on a debt in full, they might agree to
settle for a reduced amount. While paying less than you owe sounds appealing, there are several things consumers need
to consider before attempting to settle a debt.
First, in order to settle,
you must prove a need. Because a creditor is unlikely to settle on an account that is current, allowing your account to become
delinquent may be an undesirable requirement, leaving a negative mark on your credit report for up to seven years. Even if
a settlement agreement is eventually reached, your history or late payments will not be erased and could affect future credit
applications like home or car loans.
Missed payments are also likely to result in late fees and increased interest charges,
increasing the total amount owed. If you miss payments prior to reaching a final approved settlement amount, you can expect
to receive collection calls and letters. And, if an agreement is not met, you may even be sued for payment, which could result
in wage garnishment—meaning the creditor would receive money directly out of your paycheck.
The experts at Money Management International (MMI) offer the following points to consider before you make a final
decision about how to handle the debt.
“Settled in full” is a negative notation. When your settlement is final and approved
by the creditor, the lender will typically note on their credit bureau report that there is still a balance remaining, but
that the account has been "settled in full." The derogatory notation of "settled in full" will remain
on your credit bureau file for seven years.
Mortgage lenders might require you to pay in full. If you apply for a mortgage loan with a “settled in
full” notation on your credit report, it is likely that the lender will require you to repay any amounts that were “written
off” by your creditors in a settlement before granting you another loan.
There
may be tax implications. The IRS considers $600 or more of forgiven debt as taxable income, which could greatly affect
the amount owed to the government on April 15. Speak with an accountant before settling your debt to avoid any tax time surprises.
When it comes to debt settlement, the old “buyer beware” adage
holds true. If you are considering debt settlement, you might benefit from meeting with a trained credit counselor who can
help you understand all of your options.
Tanisha Warner is a spokesperson and the communications specialist for Money Management
International. Money Management International (MMI) is the nation’s largest non-profit, full-service credit counseling
agency, providing confidential financial guidance, counseling and debt management assistance to consumers for over 47 years. MMI helps consumers trim their expenses, develop a spending plan and repay debts. Counseling is available by appointment in branch offices and 24/7 by telephone and Internet. Services are available in
English or Spanish. To learn more, call 800-762-2271 or visit their website at www.moneymanagement.org.